Re: Calibration contest
@richgain - No problem, glad it helped. That's looking really great! Do you have the original cast X/Y pulleys on the Huxley? or metal ones? Have you also printed it on the Mendel90 to compare?
View ArticleRe: Calibration contest
So I printed this and got within 0.05mm for all dimensions if I want to talk best delusional case and 0.1mm worst realistic case. I think that we're within the error range of measuring with digital...
View ArticleRe: Calibration contest
I think what we want to show are the worst numbers sampled in many spots, but that is open to interpretation due to deformation. Maybe I should try throwing it on a flatbed scanner.
View ArticleRe: Calibration contest
Few more iterations and it's pretty close now. Measures 28.29/19.85 on one side and 27.88/19.61 on the other and internals are 1.4/1.51/1.35/1.48 Last print was in yellow which prints neater than the...
View ArticleRe: Calibration contest
richrap Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > @richgain - No problem, glad it helped. That's > looking really great! > > Do you have the original cast X/Y...
View ArticleRe: Calibration contest
richgain Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > My first attempt, also in pink PLA (we're > obviously quite secure and comfortable with our > masculinity). > >...
View ArticleRe: Calibration contest
@jaramaniac - Yes, several do. When you tell slic3r what layer height and wall thickness you want, it will try its best to achieve those settings by controlling the speed of the nozzle across the...
View ArticleRe: Calibration contest
Two prints on the Mendel90 using ABS to begin with. First print: - measurements 27.8/19.68 in X, 27.8/19.82 in Y, walls 4.00/4.06, gaps 1.46/1.46/1.46/1.47 ; layer_height = 0.25 ; perimeters = 1 ;...
View ArticleRe: Calibration contest
richgain Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'm just learning how to change the nozzle > diameter instead of the extrusion multiplier, as > recommended by...
View ArticleRe: Calibration contest
Are you guys using Slic3r 0.9.1? if so, where is single wall width setting? Slic3r.jpg
View ArticleRe: Calibration contest
@ Wired1 You could set the top one (default) to the width you want and it will use it on any of the other ones with a zero. Or you can change them all individually.
View ArticleRe: Calibration contest
I decided to print this on Tantillus and it turned out well. mod_embed_images_loadimage('b4b7ff16ce199ac2c216f5578227539e', '/forum/thumbcache/f78/11f/f77/e77/e69/cc1/78d/b9a/382/45c/56_800x400.png',...
View ArticleRe: Calibration contest
richgain Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > @richrap - Yes, still using the original > resin-cast pulleys on X and Y on the Huxley. > What's your experience of...
View ArticleRe: Calibration contest
I'm also still using the cast pulleys on my huxleys :) eMaker Huxley 2 with slic3r 0.9.3 : www.flickr.com 27,73 - 27,98 mm 19,85 - 20,05 mm 1,38 - 1,44 mm With almost the default Slic3r settings ;...
View ArticleRe: Calibration contest
I thought I'd try printing with PLA on the Mendel90 using the same file as I generated for the previous ABS print. Unfortunately, I forgot that PLA really needs a cooling fan. The result wasn't usable...
View ArticleRe: Calibration contest
@Emmanuel & richgain - Are you both happy with Slic3r 0.9.3? I have only been using 0.9.1 and not yet made the jump to 0.9.3, do you see any problems? @sublime - Are you happy with any newer...
View ArticleRe: Calibration contest
richrap Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > @sublime - Are you happy with any newer versions > above 0.7.2b for Tantillus yet? I hope to be > commissioning it...
View ArticleRe: Calibration contest
richrap Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > @Emmanuel & richgain - Are you both happy with > Slic3r 0.9.3? I have only been using 0.9.1 and not > yet made the...
View ArticleRe: Calibration contest
Thanks richgain, that looks promising, are the bolts still very loose (I think the design was like that) your first layer also looks a little too squished. I'm going to make the switch to 0.9.3 then....
View ArticleRe: Calibration contest
I think this competition has been very interesting, I have 3 of the pieces printed, none in any danger of winning, so I'll skip posting them. I ran the test piece through Slic3r 0.91 and Kisslicer...
View ArticleRe: Calibration contest
richrap Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Thanks richgain, that looks promising, are the > bolts still very loose (I think the design was > like that) your...
View ArticleRe: Calibration contest
Yes I'm happy with Slic3r 093 :) Tonight I even managed to get quite close to my Skeinforge results !!! (previously unmatched with any version of Slic3r) This time I tried to use the same key settings...
View ArticleRe: Calibration contest
Well it seems I didn't have anyone submit his part as an entry, so I'll try again with a simpler competition process next time I have an idea :) As for me the only improvement I was able to obtain is...
View ArticleRe: Calibration contest
Here are my pictures. #1 is done with my usual settings. Dimensions : inner 19.80, outer 28.05, gap between 1.38 and 1.51. #2 is lowering E_Steps by 5%. Dimensions : inner 19.85, outer 28.03, gap 1.41...
View ArticleRe: Calibration contest
my print. Slic3r ; layer_height = 0.2 ; perimeters = 2 ; solid_layers = 3 ; fill_density = 0.25 ; perimeter_speed = 30 ; infill_speed = 60 ; travel_speed = 250 ; scale = 1 ; nozzle_diameter = 0.35 ;...
View ArticleRe: Calibration contest
Nice result immaginaecrea. And unusual machine ! Is that a screw extruder ?
View ArticleRe: Calibration contest
DeuxVis Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Nice result immaginaecrea. Thank you my friend > > And unusual machine ! Is that a screw extruder ? Yes, is my diy...
View Article
More Pages to Explore .....